Washington Life Settlement Alert: A Sign of Things to Come?

September 2nd, 2010 by Christina Pellett

Is the life settlement market in trouble?

According to National Underwriter,the Washington State Division of Securities has issued an alert stating that life settlement investments are securities, and as such can only be sold by licensed securities salespeople or broker-dealers.

The notice, “Considering Selling Life Settlement Investments?”, defines a life settlement investment as follows: “After a life settlement contract has been created, the contract, or an interest in it, may be sold as an investment. In the case of life settlements, an investor may purchase a whole life settlement contract or a fractional interest in a life settlement contract. In the case of fractional interests, investors typically rely on a provider or broker to administer the contract.”

And why might they be  securities?

“Life settlement investments often fit the definition of a ’security’ under the Securities Act of Washington, chapter 21.20 RCW. Among other things, the definition of ’security’ includes an investment contract. Under the investment contract test, a security exists when there is an investment of money in a common enterprise with the expectation of profits to be derived primarily from the efforts of others. A life settlement investment often constitutes a ’security’ under the investment contract test and may be deemed a security on an alternative basis.”

Some producers may believe this is 151A all over again. Is this the case?

Maybe.

One thing worth noting is that this alert wasn’t issued in a vacuum. In late July, MarketWatch reported that the U.S. Government Accountability Office had warned consumers to avoid life settlements because the lack of clear state regulation of the transactions.

And on July 22, 2010, the SEC issued a press release stating the recommendations of its Life Settlement Task Force: that life settlements are securities, and should be regulated as such.

Just as 05-50 eventually led to the SEC’s Rule 151A, the actions of certain states can lead to national measures taken against a wide swath of producers’ business. These recommendations, from the SEC task force release, certainly sound familiar:

  • Consider recommending to Congress that it amend the definition of security under the federal securities laws to include life settlements as securities.
  • Instruct the staff to continue to monitor that legal standards of conduct are being met by brokers and providers.
  • Instruct the staff to monitor for the development of a life settlement securitization market.
  • Encourage Congress and state legislators to consider more significant and consistent regulation of life expectancy underwriters.

What do you think? Do Washington state’s actions and the task force’s recommendation throw up a red flag? Or are the producers involved in life settlements already largely covered by securities licenses, seeing as how they’re involved in such a complex market? Is this cause for concern? Or is it merely a formality?

Share your thoughts below!

Does It Really Matter Who the Defendant Is?

September 1st, 2010 by Heather Trese

Almost as soon as the health reform legislation was passed, opponents mobilized to see where the weaknesses were and call the new law into question. And, like many conservatives before them, they found the answer in the one place where Americans most hate to see their rights being messed with: the Constitution.

Back in May, two separate groups – the U.S. Citizens Association and a group of 17 state attorneys general across the country – challenged the constitutionality of the newly passed Patient Provider and Affordable Care Act. Specifically, the attorneys general say that the insurance mandate (the part of the law which requires that all citizens have health insurance) is against the commerce clause of the Constitution, because it regulates both economic activity and economic inactivity.

The attorneys general moved to court, led by Virginia Attorney General Kenneth Cuccinelli. Recently, however, secretary of Health and Human Services Kathleen Sebelius claims that the lawsuit should be thrown out because Cuccinelli named the wrong defendants in the case.

The case, which was brought against Sebelius, should have been brought against the Secretary of the Treasury. According to Sebelius, she doesn’t have the power to oversee the mandate and therefore is the wrong defendant.

“The secretary of the Treasury is primarily responsible for the administration of the minimum coverage provision that the plaintiff seeks to challenge,” Sebelius said.

Cuccinelli has not listed Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner as a defendant in the suit.

So, is this a deal-breaker? Could the constitutionality argument crumble because the attorneys general named the wrong defendant? It’s possible. Court cases have collapsed as a result of less. However, it turns out that government attorneys generally don’t make a big deal out of situations like this – and they happen a lot more frequently than you would think, particularly when the defendant is a government or a representative of the government. Corrective action can be taken, if it’s necessary, and in the end the case can move forward.

It seems, then, that Sebelius is out of luck again, and the suit will likely move forward.

Guest Post: How to Position Yourself in a Post-Reform World

August 30th, 2010 by Christina Pellett

This guest post comes to us courtesy of Dean A. Hill, an independent life and health agent in Michigan who specializes in individual health and small to mid-sized business planning. He founded Brightside Consulting in 2005.

Now more than ever, we must remain positive about our role and maintain clarity of purpose in our daily dealings.  The mere peddlers of product will certainly fade in to the background, making way for the true thought leaders and health plan navigators of our time.

If you are excited about this, please read on.  If the skepticism remains, we wish you well.

The final decision on how we are compensated in the future is, in many ways, yet to be determined.  Rather than reacting, we can respond to reform through our actions and interactions with clients and prospects.  Through these conversations and deeds, we can position ourselves as industry experts who just happen to sell health insurance as a byproduct of our role.

If we can paint that picture with our clients and prospects, then the “commission question” becomes inconsequential.  We become their consultant, not their agent.  We become their advocate and business partner.  Advocates and business partners not only will be guaranteed a living – they will be guaranteed a life.

A case in point

Several years ago, I worked with a client who owned a chain of retail auto parts stores.  Many of their employees were morbidly obese, and the sedentary nature of their job didn’t help this problem.

We worked with the client to obtain a nutritionist and registered nurse through a local nonprofit organization, who would come and speak with the employees. The cost was nominal.  Over the course of several months, they held sessions to educate employees about basic nutrition.  My wife and I attended the meetings as well, as a show of support and as an example to the employees.

In the end, a young store employee weighing in at 300-plus pounds decided to change the paradigm.; through the process, we discovered that he was a trained chef, but had never quite understood the mechanics of nutrition in the kitchen.  He set a goal that he wanted to meet the weight restrictions of sky-diving – and within six months, he did so.

I am humbled to have been given the chance to partner with a client who understood the need to do what we did.  I am also proud to be a health insurance agent who can find themselves in the position to help companies and change lives.

What you can do

Take the time to understand your clients now, more than ever.  Become students of their business, talk to their employees, and learn to genuinely appreciate the role they play in being an economic engine in your community, city, or state.  This mindset will translate to permanent relationships that will stand the test of health care reform, and ultimately generate more business and opportunities for your firm.

Now, go help someone!

Dean A. Hill can be reached at dean@thinkbrightside.com.

Insurance Twitter Round-Up

August 26th, 2010 by Heather Trese

Twitter can be a great source of information about the insurance industry. Here are some interesting tweets from the last week that showed up in ASJonline’s Twitter feed (Click on the user name to be brought to the tweeter’s feed):

@brettspurr: Politicians should talk about REAL problems like SS, medicare, deficit, WAR and stop opining about a stupid mosque. #politics

@GordonMarketing: Medicare Part D will increase about 3% to a national average of about 30%. Not too bad but expect the co-pays to keep edging up too

@LTCBelen: Why women need long term care insurance: They have a longer life expectancy and may out-live their spouse or partner #fb

@DalDubya: ‘Grandfathered’ Health Plans Less Inviting For Some Employers – WSJ.com – http://ht.ly/2uJ3l

@BenefitsGuru: Drug Prices Climb Faster Than Inflation, Again | NPR http://j.mp/dimmDg <8.3%

@JamesAEllis: About 20% of hospitalized Medicare patients are readmitted within 30 days says U.S. News and World Report

@AlbanyInsurance: Crash Course in Long-term Care Insurance http://goo.gl/fb/nzaab #featuredcontent #longtermcare #personalinsurance

@kendoyle62: Key Senate Democrat suggests that he didn’t read entire healthcare reform bill http://bit.ly/bhWlhQ

@NSLPN “Upcoming changes create lots of anxiety for professionals in Long Term Care.” How to prepare – http://bit.ly/d91p5g

Want more information about joining Twitter? Read our guide to getting started on Twitter.

Can Plan Types Make Employees Healthier?

August 18th, 2010 by Heather Trese

If you have an employer client who is concerned about keeping costs down (or keeping employees healthy), you may want to look at some recent studies that suggest that individuals in HRAs are healthier.

Officials at the U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) found workers who signed up for the health reimbursement arrangement (HRA) option at two large employers were healthier than other employees.

GAO analysts looked at health benefits programs at two firms – one large private employer and one large government employer. Both employers gave individuals a choice of signing up for traditional preferred provider organization health insurance or a high-deductible health insurance plan that gave the employees access to HRA health accounts.

The employees who choose the HRA option at each employer appeared to be healthier than the other employees, and their plan costs increased more slowly than costs for the other employees, according to a GAO director. However, the same director warns that the results are not useful beyond the enrollees, health plans, and employers included in the review.

However, research from the National Center for Health Statistics indicates that people who use HSAs and FSAs access care more often than users of traditional plans. They visited the dentist more, were more likely to get the flu vaccine, they see their eye doctor, and – most importantly – they are more likely to report unmet medical or prescription drug needs. This gives more clout to the idea that consumer-directed health care plan participants are, overall, more healthy.

So what does this mean for employers? A healthier population can keep costs down overall, and CDHPs are a great cost-saver to begin with. Plus, employees who are healthy show up to work, and are more productive when they’re at work.

Sounds like a win-win situation all around.

The Best Way to Succeed? Know Your Niche.

August 11th, 2010 by Heather Trese

According to a new report by the Insured Retirement Institute, boomer clients like to get their financial advice face-to-face rather than over the phone or online. This probably comes as no shock to many agents, who have probably been working with their boomer clients for many years. (That same study also showed that 55 percent of boomers more than five years out from retiring do not know how much they need to save for retirement, which is troubling – but unfortunately is nothing new.)

However, when I conducted interviews with Gen Yers to learn about their financial habits, most of them expressed a desire to purchase their insurance products online. Even though they might want to work with an advisor at some point, they’re more than happy to communicate via email, phone, Twitter, or even text message – they’re on the go, and they’re fine with a financial advisor who can communicate that way, too.

Seniors, on the other hand, may be in a variety of different financial situations, and often have younger family members with a vested interest in their financial situations. You’ll have to deal with those family members, too.

If you choose to market to one specific age group, the best thing you can do is to know your niche. Study what type of marketing that age group responds to, how to effectively market to that age group, and what communication methods that niche groups like to use. This is particularly important if you aren’t a member of the niche you want to work with.

But what if you aren’t a niche agent? If your goal is to serve one and all, you can still use niche marketing tactics to help you in your business. Before you meet with a client, try to do some basic fact-finding over the phone. Learn how old they are, or at the very least find out if they’re married or have any children, which should help give you a rough estimate of their age. Then do some basic research about the communication methods that will work best for that type of client. If it helps you, create a cheat-sheet with effective marketing and communication points for different age groups that you can refer to at-a-glance before meeting with different clients. That way, no matter the age of your client, you will be able to talk with them in a way that you’re both comfortable with.

Boomers More Afraid of Being Poor than Dying

August 4th, 2010 by Heather Trese

Dying is scary. There are no first-hand accounts to find out what it’s like, and no one can talk you through their personal experience of it and give you advice on what to do if you feel unprepared. Despite that, more older Americans are more afraid of depleting their assets than they are of actually dying.

In a poll of  3,257 people aged 44 to 75 conducted by Allianz Life Insurance Co. of North America, more than three in five (61 percent) said they fear depleting their assets more than they fear dying.

Read the rest of this entry »

Call Me a Pollyanna – But I’m No Ostrich

August 2nd, 2010 by Christina Pellett

Over the past few months, I have seen an unprecedented number of doomsday rhetoric in the trade and mainstream media.

SEC’s 151A spells an end to the independent distribution channel. PPACA spells an end to the independent health insurance agent, to long term care insurance, to Medicare Advantage.

(OK, that last one, about Medicare, was ours.)

When you take a step back and look at the big picture – not just in the insurance industry, but as a whole – things look even worse. While we’re not yet technically in a double dip recession, we appear to be headed in that direction. The modest job growth we saw this past spring seemed to be a product of 411,000 temporary Census positions. According to a July 2post on Time magazine’s Curious Capitalist blog, 1 million Americans simply stopped looking for jobs in June, removing them from the unemployment rolls, but not from unemployment. Consumer confidence is dropping at the fastest rate in 15 years. Housing prices started to recover, then slumped again.

Phew! I want to take a nap just thinking about all of it.

Yet it’s too easy to get lost in all of this. It would be ideal if I could vow to never read another news article again. As the editor of a national business-to-business publication, that would be a silly vow indeed. So instead, I keep this in mind: Until things actually fall apart, until I lose my job and then can’t find any work and fail to have enough money for groceries and get evicted and live on the streets – I’m not going to worry about all that.

That’s not to say I won’t prepare. I’m no ostrich. But it’s too easy to whip myself into a frenzy about the downward spiral that I haven’t even yet found myself in.

And here’s the point at which I relate this all back to you. Whether health care reform means no more agent, or regulations mean no more insurance, or housing prices slumping mean no more civilized society – I don’t know. Neither do you. The best course of action, I’ve heard, is preparing for the worst while putting one foot in front of the other. This month, we explore the benefits market with the results of our 2010 Employee Benefits Market Study, and our associate editor, Heather Trese, poses the question to which I alluded earlier: Is Medicare Advantage undergoing a transformation for the worse?

But don’t let all that deter your progress. If you’re employed today, and selling policies, the best you can do is keep moving forward. Your positivity and confidence will be rewarded tenfold once things do look up.

And I’m no economist, but I believe they will.

Marketing Like the Old Spice Man

July 28th, 2010 by Heather Trese

At ASJ, we like to emphasize the importance of communicating with your clients, and the power that social media can have on your marketing efforts. A recent mainstream marketing campaign highlighted both of these efforts so well that I just had to talk about it here.

I’m sure all of you are familiar with Old Spice. It’s a classic product, and frankly I’d always considered it to be something my grandfather would wear – sophisticated, sure, but definitely not young or hip. I thought it was something my husband would age into, when the time was right, but not something I expected him to be using before he turned 50.

And then the Old Spice Man took the country by storm.

His commercials are hilarious. They’re very tongue-in-cheek, and some of them are flat-out ridiculous. He often appears riding a horse, taking a bubble bath, lifting weights, or doing other masculine – yet romantic – activities. The ad campaign was genius, and before long a bottle of Old Spice brand body wash appeared in my Gen Y husband’s shower.

But then the Old Spice marketing team came up with something even more genius. Using the combined power of Twitter and YouTube, they allowed the Old Spice Man to communicate directly with his fans/consumers. People could post a question to his Twitter account, and he would answer it in his typical fashion via a personalized (albeit short) YouTube video.

The campaign was a huge success. Even people who had never purchased an Old Spice product in their life were talking about the brand, tweeting about it, posting about the company. Whether you think he’s hilarious or you don’t really understand his brand of humor, you have to admit – the Old Spice Man is on to something.

What if you used his brand of marketing in your insurance practice? YouTube and Twitter are both 100 percent free to join. If you don’t have a camera built-in to your computer, you can purchase a Web cam for less than $20 – or even borrow one from your local library. Invite people to submit questions to you via tweet, email, or Facebook, and answer them on YouTube to create a personal connection. You can show everyone how knowledgeable you are, and the marketing is totally free.

Is something like this actually possible in the insurance world? Maybe. With FINRA’s rules on social marketing, it’s difficult to say what is and isn’t allowed. And of course, if you had a client or prospect ask a sensitive question, you wouldn’t want to share their personal information via a public YouTube video. But the point is, the insurance industry needs to start stepping out of its box and thinking up new ways of communicating with its consumers. It needs to start using these amazing new marketing tools to reach out to the younger folks, and even to engage the older ones who are more tech-savvy. Otherwise, the personal touch of the insurance agent is going to be lost on the younger generations.

H.R. 4173 Has Passed: Now What?

July 20th, 2010 by Christina Pellett

Now that the Dodd-Frank bill has passed the Senate, you may be wondering: What does this mean for me?

According to National Underwriter Life & Health, “H.R. 4173 provisions would affect the standard of care that applies when insurance agents and brokers sell investment products, create a Federal Insurance Office (FIO) at the U.S. Treasury Department,  give states of domicile more authority over regulation of reinsurers, impose new standards on the rating agencies, classify indexed annuities governed by National Association of Insurance Commissioners standards as state-regulated insurance products, and impose new suitability standards on sellers of annuities.”

There are eight major components of the financial reform package:

  1. Fiduciary responsibility
  2. Financial designations
  3. Federal insurance office
  4. Optional federal charter
  5. Financial stability oversight council
  6. Consumer financial protection bureau
  7. Senior investor protections
  8. Equity indexed annuities

So how do you feel this package will begin to transform your practice over the next few years – if at all? Share your thoughts and comments here, and watch our for upcoming coverage from the Summit Business Media life and health group.